Prospective individual and institutional applicants should review the award categories and assessment criteria, then prepare materials around their main contribution. Keep the outcome title, implementation period, role and attachments consistent; general job duties are not a substitute for specific contributions.
Pre-submission check
Include the problem background, implementation plan, key processes, outcome assessment, division of work and authorisation. For joint work, distinguish design, implementation and ongoing maintenance roles. Quantitative results must state scope, comparison baseline and period.
Review materials and material suitable for public presentation may be prepared separately. Confirm permission for customer, employee and unpublished business information, and limit its use to what the evaluation requires.
Submission arrangements
Submission dates, channels and supplementary requirements follow the relevant official arrangements. This note supports preparation and does not launch an award round. Submitted materials remain subject to verification, professional review and the applicable decision process.